Dear colleagues,
I’m Harry Schmidt, a Ph.D candidate in Classics at Princeton University. I’ve taken it as my personal mission to make the lives of my fellow philologists easier with all the digital age has to offer. This blog will offer my personal insights, diatribes, successes, failures, and pretty much every other inconsequential thought I have about the future direction of classics as a discipline.
Note that I said “easier.” I’m all for new research based on data mining and other advanced forms of text analysis but there are other bases I think I’ll be better at covering, namely:
- UI theory. I’m an expert in user interface design, and let’s face it, no philology-oriented software tools have interfaces you would want to bring home to your parents. The one looker in the whole crowd is Perseus, and even it has serious usability issues, which I’ll blog about at some future point.
- File format interoperability. We have built a veritable Tower of Babel out of all the different encodings for classical texts: TLG, all the different flavors of TEI, HTML, and plain text, just to name a few. I hope to publish a C library at some point in the future with facilities for grabbing data out of all of these in order to tone down the confusion. Libxml2 will be required.
- The Canon. Thus far the TLG is the only outfit that has even taken a stab at compiling a digital canon of classical texts, and with a couple of caveats they did a good job. By “digital canon” I mean a database or rather namespace that maps each ancient author and ancient work we know about or have a copy of to a single unique identifier. In the TLG canon, each author or pseudo-author gets a 4-digit ID and each work gets a 3-digit ID. This was alright in 1975 when the TLG database format was designed, but nowadays we need something a little more robust. I’ll write more in the future about the different issues at stake here.
Thus far I’ve made three contributions to the discipline. The first two, Lexidium and Lexiphanes, are dictionary applications for the iPhone. Now you can stop carrying around your massive L-S and LSJ for the most part and just take your phone with you. These two apps already have thousands of happy users who are glad they aren’t throwing their backs out anymore. The newest, Andromeda, is my vision of the future. For now it lets you browse and search the TLG-E and PHI 5 CD-ROMs, but soon you’ll be able to throw basically anything at it: Perseus’ downloadable texts, public-domain editions from Google Books, even the hand-transcribed stuff at LacusCurtius. One easy program for reading all of your digital classical texts. In the distant future Andromeda will also be available for the iPhone and iPad, sans TLG-E and PHI for licensing reasons.
I very much want to hear from you about the kinds of tools you think the computer should be able to provide that you don’t yet have, as well as gripes with the current tools.
#1 by Michael Ritter on February 11, 2010 - 4:49 pm
Quote
Thanks for all you do, Harry. There are two features that are essential for me, and they are the reason I continue to use Perseus: 1) the ability to “highlight all” that is possible in Firefox. This is essential for finding all the citations for a given author without going blind looking through an entire dictionary entry. 2) The ability to copy and paste into Word, Excel, etc. If Andromeda had these features, I would switch in a heartbeat.
#2 by Michael Ritter on February 17, 2010 - 1:21 pm
Quote
I see that Antiquarium2 will support use with the forthcoming digital edition of the Oxford Latin Dictionary. Will Andromeda be able to serve this function?
#3 by
Harry Schmidt on February 17, 2010 - 8:50 pm
Quote
Michael, I’m in the process of reaching out various publishers in the hope of securing additional content for Andromeda users, and this would include dictionaries. As a consolation Andromeda will be able to reach out to the OLD Online, if you have a subscription, and pull data from that. It’s not ideal from a user interface perspective but it will work.
For the moment L-S is always available.
#4 by Daniel on April 23, 2010 - 3:11 am
Quote
Have you considered making a vocabulary list feature? I love the handout feature. The natural extension would seem to be some way to allow it to also gloss words.
I am very impressed with the video. (Unfortunately, I don’t have leopard, so I can’t actually try it out.)
#5 by BM-dog on June 10, 2010 - 6:09 am
Quote
Might there be the possibility of Lexidium/Lexiphanes for Android in the future? It would be great to have these fantastic resources available on smartphones other than the iPhone, although I don’t really know how big a job it is to convert the iPhone versions to get them to work on another app platform.
#6 by
Harry Schmidt on July 21, 2010 - 1:21 am
Quote
I’ve designed the new version of Lexidium to be cross-platform, so an Android version is possible. Stay tuned.